I'm trying to stay out of any discussion on what defines torture and what is acceptable. My military experience has clouded my view and being an interrogator doesn't help :o)
>>
>>
>>From what I have read Iran is nowhere near ready to deliver nuclear weapons. And thank goodness for that, because I think they would if they could.
>>
>>I think you're giving the administration a pretty easy pass on torture. Torture is torture when any country does it and I don't think there is much disagreement about that. It's just particularly disappointing when we do it while at the same time holding ourselves up as a virtuous world compass. Some pillar of freedom we are.
>
>I guess it's a good thing I'm not running the show then, from your pov. I'd take NO or at least very few prisoners. I would probably get answers from the "prisoners" on the fist day, by showing them the same courtesy they have shown us. I'd take all the prisoners up in an airplane, fly over bagdad, and drop them off, from about 35,000 feet.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"