Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Received / Outgoing Product
Message
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP1
OS:
Windows XP SP2
Network:
Windows 2003 Server
Database:
Visual FoxPro
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01210081
Message ID:
01210089
Views:
17
Try (not tested)
SELECT Cust, QtyIn, QtyOut, QtyIn-QtyOut As QtyDiff
FROM (
	SELECT Cust, SUM(qin.qty) AS QtyIn, SUM(qout.qty) AS QtyOut
		FROM Customers cs
			LEFT JOIN StandsIn qin ON qin.cust = cs.cust
			LEFT JOIN StandsOut qout ON qout.cust = cs.cust
		GROUP BY Cust
	) dt1
WHERE QtyOut > QtyIn
>I am trying to write a SQL Statement that has three tables. I am looking at WIRE STANDS being received from various customers WITHOUT WIRE on them into our Company and a certain number being sent out to customers WITH WIRE on them.
>
>We have the following tables:
>
>CUSTOMERS-Holds all of our customers company names and CUST ID.
>STANDSIN - with a field called Qty for stands received from customers
>STANDSOUT- also with a field called Qty for stands shipped out
>
>Customer has a CUST field and is indexed as CUST.
>StandsIn and StandOut also have CUST as one of their related fields to the CUSTOMER table.
>
>I want to end up with a report GROUPED by CUSTOMERS showing stands Received and Stands shipped out as followed:
>
>NAME OF CUSTOMER   QTY Recv'd    QTY Sent Out   Difference (Recv'd-Shipped)
>CUSTOMER_A         13            23             -10
>CUSTOMER_B         98            58             40
>CUSTOMER_C         112           140            -28
>CUSTOMER_D         1000          980            20
>
>What we are trying to do is to focus on the customers who have not been returning our stands, so that if we see a negative number, we know that that customer has not been returning our WIRE STANDS and can then focus on them.
>
>I tried a regular UNION SQL Statement, but that didn't seem right. Would this require more of a LEFT OUTER JOIN type of statement?
--sb--
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform