>No one said it wasn't different, but what do you mean in everything? Explain how it's better in data handling than FoxPro. Does .NET have a comparable data handling set of commands and functions to compare with FoxPro yet? I admit that it is getting there and will eventually arrrive.
>
>>If you say so.
>
>>I really think that .NET is vastly different then VFP in just about everything.

Once again how is VFP data handling so much better? The local cursor or something else? The bottleneck it had on my network when people were getting ready for reporting season?

So what are the hands down winning reasons that data handling is superior in VFP and I'll go down the list with you.

I do consider data more then just a table of rows mind you. I consider a table a subset of stings, characters, and nulls. How you deal with all of those is part of this discussion, don't you agree?