>>Dealing with some threads I realize (specialty on chatter area) it is very ussual a subject of a thread take different directions (and croud)..
>>
>>Why don't subdivide threads.. a moderator.. and/or a person envolved with it.. can subdivide..
>
>Thanks for the suggestion, but I believe that this has been requested at several occasions over the year and the vast majority of members are in favor of keeping everything as is. As mentioned in several occasions, the management of such flexibility would be practically impossible in regards to several issues related to it.

UT's interface it is for some people on the comunity too complicated.. full of buttoms.. options, etc.. For Me.. personally speaking.. I never had any kind of difficult to deal with its panel.. And, I do believe each place here of every used space are very smartly filled..

A new option/feature, could turn this a little more complicated.. But, could also turn a little more easier..

"keeping everything as is".. sounds for me.. a comfort question.. and, I believe, this "point of comfort" sounds a little dangerous.. because, start on the principle of the "perfect situation"..

but.. that's all ok.. my intenption.. was only to add.. not to subtract..

as we don't see all the conversaton.. most of times, really looks weird, few times even bizarre.. But the link with the title and its dialog takes in some moments unlogical/crazy directions.. And against of the principles of public forum.. Because seems with CIA agents dialog: "Done to any other don't understand"