How would you categorize Cheney's comments to Rush yesterday, which happens to dovetail nicely with a just-released declassified report on Doug Feith's operation?
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002961.phphttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/05/AR2007040502263_pf.htmlhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601/>I don't know that it was 'no big deal.' I also don't know that in both cases, it was intentional lying or a knowing that what was said was not factual. However, I really don't know and I think it may be the case that we may never know for sure. It is hard to believe a President could intentionally lie about such serious things, but then, oh yeah, I must be living in a dreamworld....
>
>
>
>>>There you go again, contradicting our prez and supporting the terrorists.
>>
>>Terrorists? What terrorists? We're talking about governments of two sovereign countries. Who were caught lying, and it was no big deal.
>>
>>Isn't imitation the sincerest form of flattery?
>>
>>>>>The bottom line is Iranians were caught intentionally lying... and for what?
>>>>
>>>>So was GWB, so what.