>I bet Gary is gonna come with his "VB.NET" is for girls mantra...

Mr Borges, get the mantra right - VB.Net is for little girls :)



>Oh, it's just going to be alright in your case! :)
>
>
>
>>I was pestered because my previous photo was 4 years old. I thought it was taken only 2 years ago, but with age goes the memory I guess! Now I get pestered because this one is blurry but I didn't have a good photo editory (and didn't pay attention to what I was doing as well). I'll post a new one when I can take my time or I'll send a photo to someone else here on the UT and ask them to edit or clip it for me (I think Terry volunteered). I have still been using VFP9 as my predominant tool but I worked for a couple of years with C#. It's been a good year though now since I've done that. It looks to be vb.net now (the decision is not in my hands but I'm ok with either one). It will still be vfp9 until support is no longer available from MSFT but I will be focusing on learning vb.net now and slowly it may turn into the predominant tool pver the next few years.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi Tracy,
>>>
>>>Its called an eliptical trainer - you hold the handles at the top and push/pull whilst stepping on the "pedals". Its kind of a ski action. Not a pretty sight, I might add :) I know what you mean though - I was about 20 minutes into my session with a other 25 to go and I suddenly thought that Charles may misunderstand what I had said. I just wanted to get off there and then and clarify the situation. I thought better of it but it was on my mind for the rest of the session <bg>.
>>>
>>>Its been a long time since we directly exchanged messages - are you on the .NET path yet or are you looking at other tools in addition to VFP?
>>>
>>>I like your new "mug-shot" - you will have all the guys chasing you ;)
>>>
>>>-=Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>>I often come up with solutions or possibilities while exercising. It typically happens on my treadmill when I'm about half way into the routine. Then I'm debating 'Do I get off the treadmill and mark it down now or wait?' If I wait, I'm impatient to get through the rest of my exercise routine and it's supposed to be relaxing! :o)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Whilst on my exercise machine, I suddenly thought about my example partial class code. I just want to make it absolutely clear that the name of the partial class code files have no bearing on the type, number or names of the contained members.
>>>>>
>>>>>It could be construed from my sample code that a partial class code file called CharlesHankey.Compression.cs contains a single member called Compression. This is not the case; CharlesHankey.Compression.cs merely serves to differentiate the code file from CharlesHankey.Backup.cs - as long as you maintain the "partial class CharlesHankey" construct within the codefiles, the compiler couldn't care less what members you put in each code file/partial class definition. The only requirement is that the members are unique, overloaded methods notwithstanding.
>>>>>
>>>>>I hope this clarifies any potential confusion caused. If not, feel free to come back to me on this.
>>>>>
>>>>>-=Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I'll go for two rounds and throw in some crisps.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The last of the big spenders :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Alright, I admit Wiltshire ( Malmesbury ) only represents half the ancestral homeland. The rest is up somewhere between Aberdeen and Inverness < g >