>>>>Most of what I'm talking about is public. All of it from Microsoft. No unknown languages.
>>>
>>>>I've found over the years that you're very opinionated.
>>>
>>>You're right. I know what I want. I know my theory.
>>>
>>>>My guess is you won't be happy with what's being offered. Not because it isn't good and yet fills a large percentage of what you're asking for, but because it doesn't fill 100% of what you're asking for.
>>>
>>>Why would I be happy with something new, that takes away some of the nice features I love to use?
>>>Why would I be happy to be force to something in a different way that is BACKWARD in various aspects. And no, I don't think it just different: It is backward.
>>
>>If other's had listened and responded with your type of thinking, we wouldn't have, automobiles, airplanes, antibiotics, computers, etc. I'm glad they didn't.
>
>I don't see the analogy. I don't see the progress of .NET in database applications either.

Of course you don't. That's why what you post is so funny.