>>Guilty is a loaded word. And I probably misused it. What I meant was that throwing a keg party and hiring a couple of black strippers for the guys' amusement was not an act of innocence. I meant it in the moral sense, not the legal sense.
>
>I'm not really sure I understand. Was hiring a black stripper somehow morally wrong? I mean, would it have been ok to hire a white stripper? And is being a stripper somehow morally right, but hiring one is wrong?
>
>These rules seem so confusing.
>
>So far as the comment about the keg party, everyone I went to college with is a sinner :).
We have that in common. I graduated from UW-Madison, which was and remains a notorious party school. But I never went to one where strippers were hired. Black or white. (Why hire strippers when the amateurs are so enthusiastic?)
Would it have been less of a story if the women had been white instead of black? Probably so. That's the world we live in. A black woman from the wrong side of the tracks says she was raped by white Duke athletes, that's news. No getting around it.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement