>>BTW, it's a bit funny. We gave you the same algorithm multiple times in this thread
>>and you could not make it work because of the wrong index, I guess.
>
>Well, the index is one thing, I also saw noone doing two nested loops.
>
>Bye, Olaf.

You didn't look through the thread closely. I guess, because it's too long and would not show all messages. But I gave two loops algorithm somewhere in the middle.