Right, that's what I said. He was convicted to lying and, and as you said covering up.

Never mind. It's not all that important.


>>Wrong? You mean he was convicted to outing a CIA agent?
>>I thought he was convict of not remembering who told him about the agent initally.
>>
>>If there was no crime committed in the first place, how can there be a coverup?
>
>No. Read carefully.
>He was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice.
>
>He was not tried for the crime of divulging her name (nobody was tried or indicted on that count as of yet).
>That does not mean a crime was not committed. Unless you don't consider revealing a covert operative's name a crime. But it is.