...
>>>>>>>These laws have to be reasonable to EVERYBODY, or else you are just going to feed black market gun sales.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well, if you mean 'fair' to everyone, then we at least have scope for discussion. Ok, how about this. Everybody who wants to buy a gun has to go through an evaluation, regardless of anything in their past.
>>>>>
>>>>>The evaulation thing is the slippery slope I was talking about before.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't believe in taking away rights of a million people if one person in the million is a loon.
>>>>
>>>>Huh? You'd only be taking away the rights of the loon. You pass the evaluation, you get your gun. You don't pass, you get a straw and a bag of peas.
>>>
>>>So what if one of the technicalities of the evaluation keeps a person with good intentions from recieving a firearm? Good people will get screwed by the evaluations.
>>
>>What "good intentions" are a firearm supposed to represent/bolster/aid/...?
>
>Now you are just being picky.

Not really: I've already stated I disapprove of hunting, there's a big debate on use for home security, target practice is a means to an end and useless unless you want one of the other uses. What's left but assault?