>>>>>>>He and other dem. hopful won;t participate in any debate sponsored by the FoxNews.
>>>>>>>http://news.aol.com/elections/president/story/_a/obama-clinton-to-skip-fox-hosted-debate/20070409171009990002?ecid=RSS0001
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>They will debate only for democrats and liberals but not conservatives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Frankly, I don't see a democrat avoiding a FoxNews sponsored event as cowardice, but rather as a sign of intelligence.
>>>>>
>>>>>Would you apply the same assessment to a republican avoiding CNN debates?
>>>>
>>>>Anybody who would participate in a debate run by an outfit clearly biased in direct opposition to the debater's platform is a fool.
>>>
>>>Or like a coward or shallow or the left's favorite term "narrow minded". :)
>>
>>We see it differently. As I said to Edward, I wouldn't bother playing in a basketball game that I knew was rigged against me by the refs. What would be the point? Call it cowardice if you like, but I just see it as trying not to waste my time for no gain.
>
>If we use your logic, we wouldn't have any debate at all. There are no unbias news media or unbiased moderator. Infact majority of them lean left.

Well, that's a point of view. I'm sure there are others here who would tell you that most of them lean right. I said in another post that I've only ever seen one moderator that I trust implicitly - Steve Paiken of TVO Ontario.