>>This is an interesting story. I have to admit up front that I haven't read any of the books mentioned.
>
>Nice. Pulitzer was supposed to be about journalism, IIRC? Now these really are nice examples of today's investigative reporting. That's what we always wanted to know about. Who cares about any damn wars, creative accounting, election rigging and other mundane and overly stuff.
>
>I assume next year we'll hear about "vanity plates spelling", "bumper sticker grammar by region", "Gone with old wind - items you can't find in the grocery anymore".

I think I might have missed something, or at least, misunderstood your reference. What has the Pulitzer to do with anything?