Yes, I read it. There really wasn't anything new in the article.Really? Processing of in-memory result-sets? Isn't that something that's supposed to be done in a SP and in which FP offered no advantage whatsoever? Recreation of the sort of features that were provided by FP but (allegedly) were lost with the move to C/S? The last time I saw Anders quoting FP in an article had a completely different angle.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1