Well, the help states that @@ROWCOUNT should work, however, it returned 1 in a field (similar to how COUNT works) and when I tried to use rollback (because @@ROWCOUNT was > 0) it returned the ODBC Err# 3903, (1526) The Rollback transaction request has no corresponding BEGIN TRANSACTION. So why did it return 1 then?
>>Yes and I did not write it. I am just fixing what I can (as I find problems). Changing that would involve a change to the base classes... Don't even start... :o)
>>
>I see. Best of luck then! :)
>
>In the long run you may end up with a change in the base class, though. Otherwise you may have serious problems...
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
