>Naomi;
>
>By "even gave", I pointed out that you had given the name of the author. What more could you do?
>
>“Apart from breaking forum rules, it is not even very helpful. Telling someone to go off elsewhere and wade through a long thread in an unfamiliar forum is time-consuming, and can be difficult and confusing. If you know the answer, then give it. Remember, the questioner is, first and foremost, looking for a solution to a specific problem”.
>

Tom,

I do understand this paragraph. Originally I just gave a link to the thread. Since my link was removed I had to copy the code and gave some other links from the different messages in the same thread I was trying to point the originator to.

I do not want to continue replying in this thread because it just leads to accusations. I do respect Andy as a great programmer and value his opinions just not this particular one.

I also do not appreciate sending negative comments about me behind my back to a person who never knew me before though I do not know who exactly did it.

Anyway, I want to concentrate on my job tasks at the moment, so I'm out of this thread for some time.


>I cannot understand the above paragraph. You provided a solution that was not acknowledged. You provided a link. If someone wanted to they could have used the solution. If they wished to see the original reference you provided it.
>
>This person had made up his mind and refused to consider reality.
>You have been condemned by the judge, jury and executioner all contained in one persona.
>
>
>One thing about the programming world that I have noticed. I have met and been associated with more individuals who have need of professional help then with any other group of humans. There are too many persons who think that the world revolves around them and will do whatever they can to hurt others.
>
>I think that the lesson learned is to stay away from people like this. Let him enjoy his life by himself.
>
>
>Tom