You're also into making subtle personal attacks and then trying to turn it around on the other person. I am not the only one who thinks that way.

I think this requires response.

Naomi was unhappy. I thought I had something to offer. I advised her to focus on resolving the owners' concerns rather than trying to prove her point.

I wish my involvement had ended there. Instead, somebody who in all fairness does have a vested interest but who had not objected to any of the overtly personal comments made by others, popped up to object to a single (irrelevant) suggestion I'd made- that Naomi wanted to be a MVP and wanted to answer questions to support this. Apparently this is a terrible motive for answering questions. It has nothing to do with Naomi's situation especially when she'd said it's not her motive.

What I don't "get" is why you then got involved as well. You didn't help Naomi and apparently you think everything I say is actually an insult directed against you, so what were you after?

If you're going to reply to me, can I just ask that you don't pick through trying to find fault, just take it in the spirit with which it was intended?