>>I wonder, this thread has become way too long and is currently dealing with its 20th off-topic issue. Shouldn't we start a new one about this issue?
>
>No. This is still not the longest thread in history of UT, and probably not the best case of thread drift. I also think that moving to a new thread works if done right away, within the first dozen messages in one direction of a drift. If done later, they both keep their separate lives, and further zigzag in unpredictable directions.
Yours and John Baird's (ignominious, I had to look that one up in the dictionary) plea miss emoticons like :) and <g>. But I see the humor nevertheless.
Having said that, isn't it WORTH a separate thread, a more focussed thread with serious replies? Or is it just me who's too serious here.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
