>Typical of you to take my comments out of context and inject your own interpretation. Try reading what I said again....
>
>Here's what you said:
>
>I know for a fact that the movers involved with the other forums dealing with VFP have a high disregard for the UT and will willing steer people away from joining if they know about it.
>
>What you are describing does meet the definition of "bias", so which part am I supposed to have misinterpreted?
>
>I also think it is perfectly obvious why Naomi should not allow your allegations to be attributed to her. IMHO it's perfectly proper to give credit where it is due, as I've said a number of times in this thread.


I said "movers involved in other forums dealing with VFP", which you translated to the "VFP movers", which is a total misrepresentation of what was said and substantitally changes the implications. There is a bias; obviously you never been on Profox and heard or read the comments about the UT. The fact that there is a charge here has upset the apple cart for many people.