>>>Inaccurate? That's not the issue here for me. I regard your comment on Naomi as misplaced, mean and even evil. You are trying to get rid of her using an argument that is inappropriate in the context.
>>>
>>>I never said that I wanted to get rid of her. I just stated my opinion that accepting a paycheck that one has not earned is dishonest. Do you disagree with that statement?
>>>
>>>Are you saying that I am lying when I say that she spends more time on this forum than she does doing the work for which she is being paid?
>>>
>>>I think that you are delusional.
>>
>>It is plain tactics of you. And your hidden motive is clear to me. The 'I am a taxpayer' argument is really ridiculous here.
>
>Peter:
>
>In America, the government is accountable to the taxpayer. So if Marcia, as a taxpayer, points out that her taxes are not being properly used, she is well within her rights to do so. It has nothing to do with hidden motives or plain tactics. Again, Naomi pressed her for her answer, so be careful what you ask for, you might not like the response.

John,

In the Netherlands the situation is completely similar. The taxpayer-argument is really stupid in the context. I repeat, it is merely a tactical move serving the hidden strategy to bring down Naomi. Marcia is welcome to respond. I know what I stated and I take full responsibility for it.