>>
>>I thought you'd gonna tell me that I shouldn't be so harsh toward Marcia. And I was prepared beforehand to soften my criticism. But were you? As I read your words (but there may be a language problem here indeed) you are trying to start a whole new thread, this time about compassion in all its aspects. I think that diverges attention also. The compassion John Ryan asked for was concrete and valid. The act of Marcia may eventually have really negative, economical and therefore social and psychological impact on someones rest of life.
>
>You are a piece of work. I'm not trying to create any new thread. I merely responded to your assertions of compassion. Marcia is not responsiblie in any way, shape or form, for any impact on Naomi's life, economical, social or otherwise. Naomi is!
'Piece of work', not sure what it means, but don't bother explaining. More important: I disagree here. If the kind of allegation made by Marcia eventually has impact, it is the responsibility of Marcia, as I see it. I know you'll not gonna share my opinion, but this reaction was just to let you and others know that your judgement here is not everyone else's judgement.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.