TO CESAR CHALOM:

Hi Cesar, I now better understand what drove you. And although I do not fully agree, I respect your POV. Thanks for clarifying. Hopefully the connection in Sao Paulo will be improved soon. See ya.

Peter

>ON BEHALF OF CESAR CHALOM:
>--------------------------
>
>Hi Peter,
>
>Sorry to be sending this message in pvt.
>There's a problem in the connection from Brazilian servers from Sao Paulo, and I'm not being able to post in UT every time. Sometimes it takes a week to be able to post there...
>
>I've been trying to answer for the last hour with no success.... so I decide to send you the message directly.
>If you want, you can post it there.
>
>
>>>>and because you appear to choose sides, against Naomi, is my impression. You appear to blame her.
>No Peter, that's not what I meant.
>
>I'm a big fan of Naomi. Her contributions are really very valuable for me.
>In recent times I received lots of help from her.
>The fact that I reimplored her not to continue is that in this thread she has already said that she would not continue discussing...
>And she knows that.
>
>If you check in MSDN, she already said she understood what I meant, but continued the discussion here, answering and questioning even more.
>But then comes someone else's answer, and she cannot stay quiet.
>This issue has already taken too much energy from her.
>
>We all know that.
>
>IMHO, this discussion will finish under 2 possibilities:
>1 - An administrator closes this thread
>2 - Naomi stops answering on this matter.
>
>Peter, I've read almost all your messages, and believe me, I understand you and what you mean.
>But at this time, we've reached a lose - lose situation. I can't see how someone can still gain something in this discussion.
>People are over exposing themselves, with no need.
>I didn't mean to attack Naomi.
>I just wanted to beg to her not to continue, even if she is provoqued, offended.
>
>The best for the moment is to leave this, for the best of VFP community, for the best for UT. There is no need to Naomi to deffend herself. She and many other people already did that.
>
>>> I think in the end things will be much clearer and solutions will see daylight, not tomorrow, but someday.
>Peter, believe me, I'm not sure how many people will survive after that.
>
>That's enough for the moment.
>At this moment, we need all people available, to continue developing VFP, the community, etc.
>If we concentrated all this passion to create a new tool for VFP-X ... What do you think we could obtain ? Think of the time that you spent reading and anwering at this thread. You and many others.
>
>I hope I was clear this time.
>Can't you see that this is not good for UT?
>
>Best regards
>Cesar