I wasn't referring to Rushmore, but rather the discussion on the suits...
Copyright invalid:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE6DD163CF937A25751C1A966958260Reversed:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NEW/is_1991_April_24/ai_10669577>The suit had nothing to do with Rushmore. As I recall, the courts never ruled on the Ashton-Tate case, but the government required the suit be dropped as a condition of the sale to Borland.
>
>>I thought Ashton-Tates suit against Fox Software was based on that decision? That Dbase was based on JPLDIS and that Dbase III was based on Dbase II, et al.? I thought the court ruled that the copyright on Ashton-Tate's database program was invalid.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
