>>>>Perhaps my sarcasm was lost in a language translation. To be clear, any comments about Mossad or evacuating the Jews was to mock those who claimed the Israelis were really the cause of 911. The idea is so crazy I thought my sarcasm was clear.
>>>
>>>Not quite crazy - the Israelis have a history in staging attacks that would be attributed to Arabs. Go back to 1949, Hotel King David (or something to that effect), and the gunning of a US ship.
>>>
>>Do you mean that King David bombing or Liberty incident were staged to attribute them to Arabs?
>
>Straight from paragraph one of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_Bombing:
>"The King David Hotel bombing (July 22, 1946) was a bombing attack against the British government of Palestine by members of Irgun — a militant Zionist organization.
>
>Members of the Irgun, dressed as Arabs, set off a bomb in the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, ... "
>
>I suppose they were dressed as Arabs so everyone would think the Norwegians did it. The article is probably revised, because last time I read it, there was something about Irguna planning to cast the blame on Palestinians.
>
>Also, in case of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_Incident, it looks like a failed attempt to blame Egypt.

That's very good example why wikipedia cannot be considered as a trusted source of information. Put some slight bias on few words (and it's done by strangers), and voila you get a new meaning.
Irgun never hid that they arranged King David bombing, and they gave warning to British before the explosion. How this 'dressed as Arabs' look now? It could be factually right (i have no idea) but it was obviously used in wikipedia with some different purpose (or it's just your interpretation?).
The same considerations could be used for Liberty case too. I wonder how it 'failed'. Did they use planes with Egyptian signs and then some pilot came clean and told the truth, or it was Israeli planes from the very beginning and they hoped that crew will be blind?