>>I don't care if he is 'unsupportive'. But telling the whole world that gays are to blame for the towers and the deaths, afaic, is hate mongering. That is not 'civil' by any definition of which I'm aware.
>
>I think he was much more civil than (name your liberal) in his delivery. Take Michael Moore, for instance, please!<g>

Well, I'm not entirely sure why I should care how Michael Moore behaves since I've never once alluded to him or anything he's said or presented in all the time I've been posting to the U.T., but in the final analysis, Jerry Fallwell had a huge and rabid following. When he tells the world that the destruction and deaths are directly attributable to gays it is the spreading of hate. There is nothing, I repeat, nothing, civil about spreading hate.

When some Mullah in the Middle East tells his followers that the U.S. is the direct cause of all that is evil and wrong in their society, does it really make it acceptable to you because maybe he didn't throw a pie?