>>> You forgot electronical, optical, subatomic, et al,
>
>Last I heard, electronic, optical, and subatomic were still part of the physical universe.

You said "mechanical", which sounds like you had in mind mechanicism, the attempt to crudely apply science to explain social phenomena. It failed gloriously and rather quickly, but almost a century later it is still used as a pejorative term whenever a wholesale dismissal of science is desired. So just wanted to make sure you didn't mean it in that sense - mechanics is not all of physics.

>>> Both. Why the quotation marks?
>
>Because we are discussing the term 'spiritual' .

And so did I, OK. In the context of "Or unbelievers who denounce Christianity and yet still desire to embrace 'spiritual' experiences? it sounded like you meant it that unbelievers can only have spirituality surrounded by quotation marks, not without them. If that wasn't the case, then sorry - I misread.

>>> Still easier than getting car price quotes - they always want to know where you live, your phone, email, DNA, fingerprint, retina scan
>
>Not really sure what you are saying (asking?) here ...... Or are you just trying to be comical?

By half. IMO, both car salesmen and spreaders of religion are in the business of, well, spreading. But that's about religion, business, and being organized - let's get back to our base question: are all people spiritual or only some? If the latter, which are and which are not?