>>If MS wanted VFP to succeed and continue into the future then they should have put more effort into marketing it and changing its image. This discussion has nothing to do with how good or bad VFP is. It has nothing to do with what technical enhancements were made to VFP. It has everything to do marketing.
>
>+1
>
>Now, I do not think the MS behaviour should be made personal. The decision to kill VFP marketingwise is a "decision per default". Noone really killed our beloved Fox. Not even the top guy... It just died out of a sheer absence of support.
>
>That's a typical attitude of companies in a monopoly situation. It's about time people consider MS for what it is: a company with a position that has evolved into a monopoly. We should not make it personal. Because there is nothing personal here. Just groups of people (the monopoly) bullying other groups of persons (the fragmented consumer base).

Agreed. My next major dev tool will not be from MS. But then again I'm not looking for a job in a large corporate so I am more free as to what tool to use.