C'mon Sylvain... what if every command and function is defined/described in a table? Then you could have a million commands/functions or 10 million, all with the same code in the first place.
It is an assumption that backwards compatibility costs lots of extra code, yet was stated as a fact.
>C'mon Jim, it doesn't take a genious to figure out without looking at the actual code that the more code and fonctionality you have, the harder it is to maintain (all other things being equal).
>
>>Really?
>>You've seen the source and assessed the high cost of maintaining such compatability?
>>
>>You are a lucky (and rare) person to have done so.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only