His 'facts' have been disputed by real 'facts' everywhere. It is easy to find the problems with accuracy in his movies. Here is one link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5335853/site/newsweek/I'm not going to post anymore, because there is simply too much available out there for you to find very easily.
>Why do you call him a clown? Why do you say that he doesn't know what he is talking about? Is it because of concrete facts or is it because he dare to criticise the system? I want to know because I've watched Bowling for Columbine and read some of his book and while I know that he have been accused of lying on some topic (political intervention?), I'm more incline to beleive Moore than Bush and his friends...
>
>>Getting an awareness of social issues from that clown ( or right-wing talk radio or Katie Couric or moveon.org) is like getting computer knowledge from the kid who works at Best Buy or somebody's 12 year old kid because they can get to the last level in Grand Theft Auto. <g>
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"