>Which is really dumb and ignorant, the statement Kevin made or you for refusing to accept that VFP is going nowhere? What use can a software be if it's not supported in a few years or that you can't find a qualified ressource to maintain it? You have to bypass your denial period and accept that VFP will die someday Walter.

Hmmmm. Have you noticed that there are still many many questions here regarding FPD and FPW.

Those continue to be useful more than 10 years since their last release. Why would VFP be different and shorter?



>
>>A dumb, ignorant statement that litterally proves you don't recognise or understand VFPs position in it development platform. We all know VFP shines in the data arena where .NET cannot compete to that level yet.
>>
>>All in all just another VFP bashing statement that really has no technical nor commercial merit.
>>
>>Kevin, just give it up... Leave it alone.... Your motives are clear...