>>>Lost me there, I'm afraid. Then I should be president?
>>
>>He's referring to the "president of vices", or vice president.
>
>Whether there's apun of vice or not, I still don't understand why "the two guys who can" get to be pres & vice pres.

Oh, you presume there may be more of them? I'll believe it when I see proof. Or at least 95 proof.