Thanks, I hadn't seen that message (too many messages, too little time)

>If Brooks didn't CC to you:
>He was on Advisory council (also Les Pinter).
>Cetin
>
>>I was thinking along the lines of CodeBook for Mere Mortals was based on CodeBook in that the free classes of CodeBook were used as the basis for developing the Mere Mortals version. It's not really important, was just interested.
>>
>>>Well depends on how yu define 'based on':) What I mean a CSLA user feels at home with Devforce and in documentation there are a lot of references to CSLA and Rocky. I, of course, don't know inside how much they're related (is Rockford involved in development, were they friends, coworkers etc and do not want to say something wrong).
>>>Cetin
>>>
>>>>Hi Cetin,
>>>>
>>>>is Devforce really based on CSLA? I have downloaded the express version of DevForce, but haven't had the time to investigate it.
>>>>
>>>>>Yes it's nice and I thank Rockford who made the .Net much more appealing to me. Now I continue with Devforce which can be seen as an enhanced CSLA:)
>>>>>Cetin
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Craig,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm not sure what you define as a full application framework, but it's got everything I need to build an application with and it is based around using Business Objects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Isn't CSLA more of a business objects framework as opposed to a full application framework?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hi Matt,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>along with those mentioned you could also check out CSLA.Net (http://www.lhotka.net/) which is a free framework.