>but if what Andy posted is accurate, the question would be do you condone that? Anyone doing what Andy claimed she did has taken things too far.
>
>Is there really any doubt that his post is accurate?
>
>In his screen shot, it clearly shows that IP address 70.23.12.52 belonging to Naoimi Nosonovsky was used to post a message on the MSDN Forum. Eric's logs showed that "Andy" logged in from the very same IP address on May 28th at 11:08:28 PM. Do you really think that Andy is making this up or that Eric's logs are wrong?

I think that if you read my post again, you will see that although I am not saying what Andy posted was indisputable fact, I am not trying to shoot it down, nor am I trying to defend Naomi. Actually, I think he has solid evidence, with the latest information being the most telling. My post also was to point out that what she's done to help people out here has no bearing on this separate act of hacking into someone's account. You can't let someone off that hook just because they've tried to be helpful in this forum. And it's especially disturbing if she used privileges here to secure the information she needed in order to perform the hack. (A couple of side notes are that the UT should not allow moderators to view a password - they should only be able to reset it and, truth be told, Andy should not have used the same credentials, but that does not excuse the acts of a hacker.) Andy has every right to privacy and security in relation to his online accounts. I expect Michel to discuss this with Naomi. If he feels Andy has made his case, then her moderator rights should be pulled at the very least.