>>However, if you want to a class available to a team of developers but DON'T >want them to change it this works.
>
>I don't know.... Seems to me if you have to go to measures like that to secure code, its time to find new developers.
>
>The point I brought about debugging was really rhetorical < s >. There are a host of other issues - compiling classes would fail. After all - no source code...right?? The process of removing code, replacing code to rebuild, removing code again, and so forth. Seems pretty counter-productive.
it is. that's why i don't do it. it will make it harder for ppl to 'borrow' your code, which is what he seemed to be asking.