>>>>I have been asked, privately, by someone for whom I have nothing but respect, and who does not condone or excuse Naomi's action, to nevertheless let this matter lie. I have agreed to do so and this matter is now closed as far as I am concerned.
>>>
>>>Andy,
>>>
>>>I am saying this openly
>>>
>>>You have my respect for doing so. And I suppose the respect from other people too.
>>>
>>>I think this is a grand and human gesture
>>>
>>>Thanks you
>>
>>Well, he can drop it, however he has contacted Michel and Michel needs to address this openly. It would appear that a moderator (not sure if that's the exact correct title here) has violated the trust of the UT mgt. and the people who use the UT. If that is the case, then Naomi needs to be removed as a moderator. Addtionally, the UT mgt. should not allow passwords to be viewed. Passwords can be reset, but now viewed. That's a basic security precaution that should be employed everywhere. It sounds like that rule was being ignored by the UT.
>
>I do not know whether passwords are visible, do you ?
>It is my belief that this is a matter between her and Michel
>
>Moreover, I do not have any problems with her accessing my account/posts here on the ut. All my posts are public and I can review them later. Never have I seen any of them altered

Andy used the same credentials here and on Foxite. Only by actually seeing the password could she have been able to use it over at Foxite. Seeing the user ID would be common, but seeing the PW is not. If she was prevented from seeing the PW, then she could not have used it over at Foxite, so it's reasonable to assume she was not prevented from seeing it here. Unless, of course, he used a very weak, very guessable PW. Again, this is something Michel should investigate.