Hi Evan.

>I think you have some apologies to hand out.

Why would Andy apologize? Has he been proven wrong? If so, then he should, and knowing Andy's character, he would. However, I see nothing for him to apologize for here. He showed very convincing evidence of wrong-doing and Naomi has yet to tell her side of the story. In addition, Michel has yet to comment on whether Naomi had access to UT account information.

An analogy is a prosecutor outlining the facts of a case, then being asked to apologize for accusing the alleged perpetrator before the defence even presents their case. That would be bizarre!

Doug