>What Kevin is saying is that Naomi has hacked into Andy's account and shared info with others (her admission). The fact that she has done this means her integrity is not the greatest .. and because her integrity is not the greatest .. she is not someone that should have administrator rights on the UT. I agree with Kevin. This doesn't have anything to do with the battle between her and Andy or other sites .. we are just saying that it doesn't appear that she can be trusted with an administrator account and it makes us nervous that someone like that has those rights on the UT.
>
I cannot say that I disagree, though I don't want to say that I agree. The most important thing is that UT integrity as a forum was not compromised. If you see from my message I also think that an UT sysop could behave differently, but at the same time it is not my discretion to tell UT/Michel what kind of sysops they should use.