>>>SNIP
>>>>
>>>>And then at the end, this (predictable?) story about credit cards, UT security etc. Kind of makes you wander what/who is real target here.
>>>
>>>This is exactly what had come lately into my mind!
>>>
>>>The UT in particular (considering the source of the 'we have a hacker...' thread) or sowing disharmony in the VFP community.
>>
>>Either you don't know or know much about Andy Kramek or I misunderstand your implication that he would in any way want to "sow disharmony in the VFP community" I think it is very safe to say his contribution to the "VFP community" regularly exceeds your own both in quantity and quality and has for quite some time. It's fine to play the gadfly and whine about anyone who fails your VFP loyalty tests, but to mischaracterize Andy's motives in this would be unworthy of you.
>
>Yes, I can see how it is easily readable as you interpreted it and I certainly did not intend any connotation that AndyK was doing anything regarding disharmony. I understand him to be a longtime promoter/defender of FP/VFP.
>
>But I did get in mind AndyK's longtime "distaste" for the UT and that this event was perhaps seen as a chance to do it some serious damage.
>
>The "sowing disharmony" was intended to refer to those who used the "Hacker..." thread to raise additional issues regarding UT policy/management/staff and who tried to push disagreement towards nastier ends.
>
>To be direct: Andy, I in no way intended to suggest that you were trying to sabotage the VFP community and I apologize that it looked otherwise.
>

Well put, but will Andy see it? By his own statement he chooses not to participate in the UT, to the point of saying he will not answer replies in threads he initiates. Apparently he has write-only access ;-)