>His memory is just fine. It didn't even require yout to "view source", it was what you saw just trying to read messages!
>
>

Oh yes! At one time there was a problem and all the source code appeared with the text of the message! Ah, the good old days. :)



>>No, but obvously you do! :-D
>>
>>>Remember a few years ago when you could view the source code from a thread from the UT and see the persons ID and password?
>>>
>>>
>>>>In some aspects of that secrecy, I support him. He has, for instance, not revealed who he has banned for their privacy and I can understand that. There may be other issues where he might decline to reveal something and I might support him on it. However in this case it seems obvious to me that users want a certain level of privacy and want to know precautions are in place. Answering the questions he's been asked in no way reveals anyone's personal data. It is merely good business to respect your user's desires for privacy and to reassure them by answering questions like this. But he has so far just taken an attitude that demonstrates a complete disrespect for his users.
>>>>
>>>>>Michel's not know for being forthcoming about much regarding the forum. Personally, I think it secrecy for secrecy's sake, but either way, I'm sure he will say very little about this.
>>>>>
>>>>>>I would like to know where it has been confirmed? Another consultant said he couldn't see passwords. Is that an answer? Not in my book. I find it astounding that Michel has not directly answered this question - to my knowledge - even though he's been directly asked. I couldn't imagine treating the security concerns of my users with such disdain.