>>>>Well, at least you are aware of it. Most others here who reacted to my challenge also appear to have an over-developed sense of it, but in a somewhat different direction. They react like little children and have not really grown up yet. You know how little children think about right and wrong, don't you? Something is right or it is wrong, no matter the context. From programmers (who use IF all the time) I had expected more appreciation of the context.
>>>
>>>Peter,
>>>
>>>There is *NO* excuse for Naomi's entering of Andy's account without his permission or knowledge. None. Naomi admitted it was wrong, and apologized. You are the one who is dragging this out by arguing in some way she was justified.
>>
>>You are the one who is dragging this out by arguing in some way she was justified. Mike, that's what YOU make of it. All I have done, is trying to make people here realize that the theory says that the context matters. This discussion can be done completely without referring to Naomi's specific case. Eventually the arguments used in that discussion can help people forming an opinion about Naomi, but that's up to them.
>
>Peter, I think you just like to argue for the sake of arguing. Sheesh.

Kevin, this is not true.