>>I sincerely doubt M$ will sell Fox because the same thing will happen ... it will compete with their existing products. I see .Net as nothing more than a way to trap people into using SQL Server. Why should a small business buy SQL Server and pay license fees if Visual Foxpro can do the same job with no distributed fees?
>
>.NET does not require SQL Server. You can save to Access, .dbf's, Oracle, mySQL, etc., etc., etc.
Not to mention SQL Server Express, which is free and will work just fine for many of the Mom and Pops who use FoxPro.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only