Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
To have an argument
Message
De
19/06/2007 19:58:33
 
 
À
19/06/2007 18:06:02
Dragan Nedeljkovich (En ligne)
Now officially retired
Zrenjanin, Serbia
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01232614
Message ID:
01234409
Vues:
9
>>My point was simply the way broadcast licenses are done here there is a lot of marketing and packaging of programming with different commercial arrangements. ( though it could be argued what we actually have is 4 BBCs and then 400 channel 4s. ) In fact, of course, the major networks all own networks in the higher channel numbers where they get more mileage from products originally developed for the major network so the syndication game is very much in flux as well. So while it looks like there are a lot of channels there aren't a lot of owners of channels.
>
>I'm quite amused with the fact that I have to pay to watch something with advertisements. If it's already paid for, i.e. time sold, why should I pay for it again?
>
>I wouldn't mind paying a dolar or two per channel a month, or maybe $.50 an hour to watch whatever I want, without ads. I mean without ads. That means not even self-advertising - I don't care what are you showing in the next five hours, you don't have to shout it at me, I can read the schedule from the web, thank you.
>
>The recent claim that the TV series may be dead soon because people don't want to watch ads, so if people would please watch them so we can keep them alive - is anywhere between ridiculous, false, moronic and outright rude, IMO. When was the last time they tried without ads? When was it they last tried to make money by collecting subscription only? I don't count HBO, because 1) they self-advertise a lot, 2) you can't take one channel, you always must buy the bundle.
>
>Why bundle, afraid of the market?

The subscriber model is alive and well. The higher cable channels that are commercial are just like regular broadcast ( there used to be a UHF spectrum that was much the same ) but you pay for the cable distribution. Yhere is also a market for reaching audiences through advertising. The problem isn't all that, it's the distribution model - i.e. cable or satellite. The advertising model is getting weaker since people TIVO or record and skip commercials ( I almost never watch anything in real time )


I think the future of television will be very much what you describe - subscription over broadband as either pay per view or subscription to a particular series/show including the whole back catalog. All digital, same broadband as internet. The days of network television are coming to an end.


Charles Hankey

Though a good deal is too strange to be believed, nothing is too strange to have happened.
- Thomas Hardy

Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don't mean to do harm-- but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.

-- T. S. Eliot
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
- Ben Franklin

Pardon him, Theodotus. He is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe and island are the laws of nature.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform