Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
To have an argument
Message
De
20/06/2007 06:12:58
 
 
À
19/06/2007 18:06:02
Dragan Nedeljkovich (En ligne)
Now officially retired
Zrenjanin, Serbia
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01232614
Message ID:
01234438
Vues:
12
>>My point was simply the way broadcast licenses are done here there is a lot of marketing and packaging of programming with different commercial arrangements. ( though it could be argued what we actually have is 4 BBCs and then 400 channel 4s. ) In fact, of course, the major networks all own networks in the higher channel numbers where they get more mileage from products originally developed for the major network so the syndication game is very much in flux as well. So while it looks like there are a lot of channels there aren't a lot of owners of channels.
>
>I'm quite amused with the fact that I have to pay to watch something with advertisements. If it's already paid for, i.e. time sold, why should I pay for it again?
>
>I wouldn't mind paying a dolar or two per channel a month, or maybe $.50 an hour to watch whatever I want, without ads. I mean without ads. That means not even self-advertising - I don't care what are you showing in the next five hours, you don't have to shout it at me, I can read the schedule from the web, thank you.

The BBC does self-advertise, but no longer than a commercial break, and then only at the end of a show. So, if it's a 2.5 hr epic film, 0.5 hr sit com or 1 hr drama, you get tos see it all without pauses. Mind you, sometimes I wish they would have breaks, esp when I'm bursting for a Jimmy Riddle and the film's too absorbing, or I can't afford to miss any dialogue, etc.

>
>The recent claim that the TV series may be dead soon because people don't want to watch ads, so if people would please watch them so we can keep them alive - is anywhere between ridiculous, false, moronic and outright rude, IMO. When was the last time they tried without ads? When was it they last tried to make money by collecting subscription only? I don't count HBO, because 1) they self-advertise a lot, 2) you can't take one channel, you always must buy the bundle.

If the TV series is dead how come they're extending them to 24-like series all over the place? That's the trend now: 24, Prison Break, Lost, Vanished, et al?

>
>Why bundle, afraid of the market?

One of the reasons I won't buy Sky - the bundle.
- Whoever said that women are the weaker sex never tried to wrest the bedclothes off one in the middle of the night
- Worry is the interest you pay, in advance, for a loan that you may never need to take out.
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform