>>Imho, you should not try to get from 'Anchor' too much. It was added to alleviate programmatic usage of Resize. Basically, as long as you are able to code Resize you are not required to use Anchor.
>
>Interesting. I see it the other way 'round. Whenever Anchor will do the job, you don't have to write code in Resize.
>
>Tamar

It depends also on historical aspect: I used to write 'standard' anchor-like Resize class code in days when Anchor wasn't here yet, so I still rely on it.