Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
To have an argument
Message
De
20/06/2007 08:48:33
 
 
À
19/06/2007 15:59:05
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01232614
Message ID:
01234467
Vues:
12
It appears they are their own 'liberal' world :o)

http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,2105978,00.html

Much like the majority of the media in the U.S.

>>>>You and Charles both mentioned syndication. Is that a TV term or just US TV term, cos I've no idea what it means? I've heard it before, mind.
>>>
>>>Well, you see, in non-socialist countries where there are more than 2 government controlled TV stations <bg> there are a lot of stations that fill most of their day with content previously run on the big networks. To buy the rights to a show for running re-runs ( Friends each night at 6 pm for example ) they by the program in syndication at which point they pay a fee every time they run the show, but are assured others in their market can't buy those rights as long as their contract is in effect.
>>
>>If you refer to the BBC - it's not govt run and there are at least 6 BBC TV channels now.
>>
>
>Ah yes, forget we are post Maggie <g> ) ( kidding about the socialized television - BBC of course could never be confused with favoring socialism <s> )
>
>No, I realize BBC is its own world. ( rather like London's city government <s> ) and subject to a lot more competition as well.
>
>My point was simply the way broadcast licenses are done here there is a lot of marketing and packaging of programming with different commercial arrangements. ( though it could be argued what we actually have is 4 BBCs and then 400 channel 4s. ) In fact, of course, the major networks all own networks in the higher channel numbers where they get more mileage from products originally developed for the major network so the syndication game is very much in flux as well. So while it looks like there are a lot of channels there aren't a lot of owners of channels.
>
>And the wild thing is in the next ten years it will all be across broadband and anybody who can have a web page now can have a TV station and the whole game will change again.
>
>>>
>>>Right now I get roughly 300 channels ( and there is nothing on ... <s> ) if you don't count all-musics channels ( get about 100 of those ) or foreign language or weird sports channels to which I don't subscribe.
>>
>>I can pick up loads on free digital - far more than I care to even peruse.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform