>Gary got it, it was actually me trying to play with your words, and the point was: choose any, it's more of a taste. I like Craig Berntson description, stating VB is more of a RAD, whereas C# goes for components and stuff.

I can't get the logic of Craig why VB is RAD and C# is not because AFAIK, both are being promoted as RAD tools.

>I'm affraid I didn't get your logic, though... so, if I were a C# guru, the joke would be extremely funny?

I am not a C# guru but yes, it is indeed extremely funny because of the statements that curly brackets are considered culprits in messing-up codes which are totally in contrast with its original purpose.

I say sorry if I did not get your point the first time.