>>>I completely agree that there is a lot injustice to be addressed and I always feel we are not getting our money's worth out of our governments. but I also have low expectations that government is qualified to social engineer solutions to many of these problems. I believe many can be solved, but only by the private sector creating win-win situations where a solution is accepted because it works rather than mandated because "the experts" have decided it is good for us.
>>
>>Unfortunately, most corporations have no interest in 'win-win'. They are only interested in 'win'. What happens on the other side of the hyphen is of no real interest to them.
>>
>
>But if the market is reasonably free that relationship won't be sustainable for the corporation because the other side of the hyphen has a vested interest in changing it.
>
>I agree that the system is imperfect ( sometimes because of the lack of regulation to keep the playing field level, sometimes because of inept - or corrupt - tinkering with regulating the playing field )
>
>But the point stands that the only relationships that are ultimately sustainable are those where both parties have a vested interest in maintaining them.
~sigh
I said the same thing, but you say it so much better.
The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can bribe the people with their own money.
- Alexis de Tocqueville
No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.
– Mark Twain (1866)