Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Net not backward compatible at all?
Message
From
12/07/2007 15:40:43
Mike Cole
Yellow Lab Technologies
Stanley, Iowa, United States
 
General information
Forum:
ASP.NET
Category:
Installation, Setup and Configuration
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01239888
Message ID:
01239890
Views:
7
>Just a quick question about .NET (which I am not actually deploying apps in as of yet).
>
>I recently had to re-install all the apps on a notebook, after a format and re-install of XP Pro. One of the apps (OmniTrader) which uses NET required that NET 1.1 and also NET 2 be installed. Is this normal, that one app would require more than one edition of NET? I experienced a similar instalation requirement on another NET app.
>
>Is there no backward compatibility with NET? I ask because, I am using a number of JAVA apps, and Java doesn't require multible versions of Java.
>
>Note that I am talking about NET and Java from a user's standpoint, as I don't develop in either.
>
>I guess what I am wondering is this: in about the year 2017, let's say there are 5 more version of NET by then. Would that mean an end user might have 4, 5 or even 10 versions of NET on his computer by then?
>
>Thanks... just curious.

I am guessing what is going on is the application you are using is written in 2.0, but references assemblies written in 1.1.
Very fitting: http://xkcd.com/386/
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform