Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
The real reason that YouTube exists...
Message
From
13/07/2007 09:42:19
 
 
To
13/07/2007 09:38:17
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01238789
Message ID:
01240153
Views:
15
That certainly explains your perspective then. I watch it as well but there have been some stories presented as reporting the news which were extremely slanted towards one side and in some cases left out the other side completely. I only know this because I know people personally who were onsite or involved in the story and heard their views personally. Now I am well aware that many other (well most) news organizations do the same thing. They go for the human interest or the slant which will gain them the most shock value and up the ratings. Al jazeera is hardly alone in that, and you may be right, they may do it less often than others, but they are still not a completely objective and non-partisan news agency.

In my personal experience, if you discount immigration entirely, then Univision is the most non-partisan and equal sided news source I've watched.



>>I have watched a lot of the English version of Al Jazeera and their printed news as well. I will agree that they do seem fairly independent, but their stories are almost always slanted.
>
>I started watching them recently (english of course) when I switched cable supplier. To me they look/sound refreshingly clear/convincing comparing to those convoluted/obfuscated news bot(s) we all know and don't like :)
>
>They pleasently reminded me of some old times, long gonne for world journalism when news were something worthed to to watch, read or listen. Right now, my perception of world news is pretty simillar to noise of hoover sucking inn house dust, with only diff that with news;
>Dust is going in wrong direction. <vbg>
>
>I don't know why you think they are slanted. Who can really tell?
>Does anybody ever goes after news reporters rechecking real facts?
>All you can base yourself uppon, is that unexplainable feeling
>that someone is more trustwordy then the others so you just believe them more. Then again if you have conglomerate of world new reporting that sky is
>bright orange who ever tells you otherwise might sound really like a weirdoe :)
>
>I usually browse back/fourth between channels and then most of the
>times end up watching exactly Al-Jazeera.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>Of course if she actually appeared like that on Arab Al Jazeera she'd be stoned to death as a harlot or beaten to death by the canes of the mutaween
>>>
>>>It seem you never watched Al Jazeera. It's really an independent channel. Their woman reporters like her usually...
>>>
>>>
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera
>>>
>>>"In March 2003, Al Jazeera was awarded by Index on Censorship for its "courage in circumventing censorship and contributing to the free exchange of information in the Arab world."
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform