>>>>>>>It barks, therefore it is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nope, you are a DIA (dyslexic insomniac agnostic ). You spend all your nights awake pondering the existence of dog.<g>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Er barko, er sum, hmmmm. OK
>>>>>
>>>>>Arfo ergo sum?
>>>>
>>>>"I think, therefore I am" said {insert your favorite stupid ethnic group} and vanished.
>>>
>>>And as we skeptics say:
>>>Sum, ergo cogito (I am, therefore I think) (with apologies to Descartes)
>>
>>Actually, isn't it "Cogito ergo reputo sum" (I think, therefore I think I am).
>
>FMI is there not a word for "that" (like "quis" or summat) that would need to go in that sentence: I think, therefore I think that I am? Only in English AFAIK do we drop the conjunction

Got me. I got it from a translation site.